A division bench allowed an interim application condoning the delay in filing a review petition and directed immediate registration and hearing of the review petition.
Interim application allowed, review petition directed to be registered forthwith
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD
Digitally signed by VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Date: 2023.07.21 11:08:54 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1254 OF 2023
IN
REVIEW PETITION NO. 7 OF 2023
Ajay Ishwar Ghute and Ors. ...Applicant/Petitioner
V/s.
Meher K. Patel and Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Rajesh Adrekar for petitioner/applicant.
Mr. Karl Tamboly, counsel a/w Mr. Kaba Wagle I.by Purazar Fouzdar
for original petitioners.
Mr. A.P. Vanarase-AGP for the State.
Mr. Shridhar Gallipilli – Tahsildar, Talasari present.
CORAM:SUNIL B. SHUKRE &
MILIND N. JADHAV, J.J.
DATE:20th JULY 2023.
P.C. :
. Heard.
2.For the reasons stated in the application, the application is
allowed. Delay is condoned.
3.Review petition be registered forthwith and placed it before
this Court for hearing.
4.Interim application is disposed of accordingly.
(MILIND N. JADHAV, J) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J)
2-ia-1254-2023.doc
varsha
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the review petition be condoned.
Ajay Ishwar Ghute and Ors.
Meher K. Patel and Ors.
MILIND N. JADHAV
SUNIL B. SHUKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court