The High Court at Bombay dismissed a criminal revision application for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite being listed for hearing.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
902-revn-426.22.doc
BIPIN Digitally signed byBIPIN DHARMENDER DHARMENDER PRITHIANI PRITHIANI Date: 2023.10.1817:50:41 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 426 OF 2022
Neelam Naresh Kewalramani … Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for the Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM: R. N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 18 OCTOBER 2023
P.C. :-
. It appears from record that since 7 December 2022, none appeared for the applicant. Finally, on 16 October 2023 the matter was placed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ and was adjourned for today. Today also, even on second call, none appeared for the applicant.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
Neelam Naresh Kewalramani
State of Maharashtra
R. N. LADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
