In a non-speaking order, the High Court of Bombay dismissed two criminal revision applications and two interim applications for default in appearance and non-deposit of amount, citing lack of prosecution.
All applications dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence and failure to deposit amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by VINA VINA ARVIND ARVIND KHADPE KHADPE Date: 2023.03.13 11:41:33 +0530
Vina Khadpe
1 / 2
48-revn-163-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.163 OF 2022
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1252 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.163 OF 2022
WITH
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.164 OF 2022
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1253 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.164 OF 2022
Sanjay Diwakar Todankar… Applicant
vs.
State of Maharashtra and ors… Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Mr. M.G. Patil, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM:AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED:MARCH 09, 2023
P.C.:
1.By order dated 22nd June, 2022, time to deposit the
amount in accordance with the impugned order was extended
by four weeks.
2. On 20th October, 2022, none appeared for the Applicant
Vina Khadpe
2 / 2
48-revn-163-2022.doc
nor the amount as directed was deposited.
3. On 23rd February, 2023, none appeared for the Applicant.
4. Today also none appears for the Applicant. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in prosecuting the Applications.
5. All Applications are dismissed for non prosecution.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
Sanjay Diwakar Todankar
State of Maharashtra
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court