In WP 756 of 2023, the High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the learned advocate for the petitioner without costs.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27-wp-756-2023 .doc
Ghuge
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.756 OF 2023
Nazim Sattar Padvekar … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Ors … Respondents
Mr. Akram Pathan for the petitioner.
Mr. M.G. Patil APP for the State.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : MARCH 8, 2023
P.C.:
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Nazim Sattar Padvekar
The State of Maharashtra
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
