The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the public interest litigation. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the PIL on the grounds of withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k
1/1
6-PIL-79-2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 79 OF 2023
Tushar Ramesh Damgude .....Petitioner V/s. Assistant Director, Archaeology Department and Ors. .....Respondents
Mr. Rishabh R. Pardeshi for the Petitioner.
Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni a/w Ms. Sweta Shah for Respondent Nos.1 and 2-PMC.
Mr. P.P. Kakade, GP a/w Mr. M.M. Pabale, AGP for Respondent No.3State.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, ACTING CJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE : 20th APRIL, 2023.
P.C. :
The learned Counsel for the Petitioner on instructions seeks
leave to withdraw the PIL. The PIL is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM RAJALINGAM KATKAM KATKAM Date: 2023.04.21 11:16:13 +0530
Tushar Ramesh Damgude
Assistant Director, Archaeology Department
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
