The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench dismissed a PIL filed by a petitioner challenging the quality of food in Anganwadi Centers in Washim District, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate the scheme's failure.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
44-PIL-61-23.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.61 OF 20 23
Shubham S/o Laxman Dhage, Indira Awas, Ansing, Tq. And Dist. Washim
-vs-
State of Maharashtra, Thr. Ministry of Women and Child Development Dept. Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Shri Ram Karode, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri S. M. Ghodeswar, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 6.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : December 13, 2023
(Abhay J. Mantri, J.) (Nitin W. Sambre, J.)
Asmita
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shubham S/o Laxman Dhage
State of Maharashtra, Thr. Ministry of Women and Child Development Dept. Mantralaya, Mumbai
Abhay J. Mantri
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
