Disposed

Maza Bharat Samajik Sanstha Thr Its Secretary Jagannath Pandurang Kharge v. the City and Industrial Development Corproration Ltd. Thr Its Chairman and Ors.

Bombay HC20 Dec 2023PIL/200/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This PIL petition by a residents' society requested directions for infrastructure facilities in Gharkul Colony. The Court directed the respondent authorities to consider a prior representation and issue a binding decision within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to wait for the decision of the respondent authority on their representation dated 17.07.2023 within eight weeks.

Maza Bharat Samajik Sanstha Thr Its Secretary… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

Digitally signed by LAXMIKANT LAXMIKANT GOPAL GOPAL CHANDAN CHANDAN Date: 2023.12.20 20:20:29 +0530

¶2

1 (20) PIL-200.23.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 200 OF 2023

¶5

Maza Bharat Samajik Sanstha Through its Secretary Mr. Jagannath Pandurang Kharge : Petitioner.

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The City And Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (CIDCO), Through its Chairman and Managing Director & ors. : Respondents.

¶8

Mr. Jagannath P. Kharge – Petitioner in person.

¶9

Mr. Rohit Sakhadeo i/by Sakhadeo and Associates for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. S. V. Gavand for Respondent No.3 – Corporation.

¶10

CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 20^th DECEMBER, 2023

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

1 On our request, Learned Counsel Mr. Rohit Sakhadeo

¶13

has put in appearance for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (CIDCO) and

¶14

Learned Counsel Mr. S. V. Gavand has put in appearance for Respondent No.3 – Corporation.

¶15

2 This Public Interest Litigation Petition has been filed

¶16

1 of 3

¶17

LGC

¶18

2 (20) PIL-200.23.doc

¶19

with a prayer that a direction be issued to the Respondents to maintain and prepare the internal roads, drainage system, to provide for a new drainage system and other facilities like public library, community hall, creche and senior citizen hall etc. This Petition has been filed by a resident of Gharkul Colony, Sector15, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai.

¶20

3 Exhibit-I is a representation made by the Petitioner Society on 17^th July 2023 to the Managing Director, CIDCO and the Municipal Commissioner, Panvel City Municipal Corporation for ventilation of the grievances.

¶21

4 Accordingly, we direct that the appropriate authority of Respondent No.1 or Respondent No.3, as the case may be, shall consider the said representation dated 17^th July 2023 and take appropriate decision and action, which may be warranted in law, thereon. The decision under this order on the said representation shall be taken by the authority concerned within a period of eight weeks from the receipt of copy of this order.

¶22

2 of 3

¶23

LGC

¶24

3 (20) PIL-200.23.doc

¶25

5 With the aforesaid directions, the present Public

¶26

Interest Litigation Petition is disposed of.

¶27

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)

¶28

(CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶29

3 of 3

¶30

LGC

Maza Bharat Samajik Sanstha Thr Its Secretary Jagannath Pandurang Kharge v. the City and Industrial Development Corproration Ltd. Thr Its Chairman and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maza Bharat Samajik Sanstha Thr Its Secretary Jagannath Pandurang Kharge v. the City and Industrial Development Corproration Ltd. Thr Its Chairman and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shubham S/O Laxman Dhage Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Ministry of Women and Child Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Rajat Banerjee vs City and Industrial Development and Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (Cidco Ltd)

Kamal Jagdish Singh vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority

Shailesh Gandhi and 5 Ors. vs Maharashtra State Information Commission

Dharma Rajaram Vallakati Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sandeep Thakur Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sandeep Kumar Indrakumar Tiwari vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Bhagvanji Raiyani vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.

Vardhaman Builders Vs Narendra Balasaheb Ghatge

Mahatma Education Society Vs State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary Urban Development and Anr.

Patil Consturction and Infrastructure Ltd. Thr. Manamath Shivaram Sakhare Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary and Ors.

Franco-Indian Pharmaceuticals Private Limited vs Benatton Pharmaceutical Private Limited

Lyka Exports Limited vs Neeraj Agarwal Proprietor of Cadiz Lifesciences

Aditya Birla Finance Limited vs Naga Sharath