The Gauhati Bench High Court of Judicature at Aurangabad disposed of a Public Interest Litigation because the petitioners appeared in court and expressed a desire to withdraw the petition.
The petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
918 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.61 OF 2019
SHRAVANBAL MATA PITA SEVA SANGH SONAI THROUGH ITS
PRESIDENT RAJENDRA EKNATH NIMBALKAR AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Mr.K.B.Jadhav h/f Mr.P.S.Pawar, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr.S.G.Karlekar, AGP for the Respondents/State.
Mr.Bhushan Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.)
DATE : JULY 27, 2023
PER COURT:
1.This matter was heard for quite some time. After taking
into account several factors, we expressed our disinclination to
entertain this petition.
2.The learned Advocate for the Petitioners sought a pass over
to take instructions.
3.After this matter was called out at the end of the day, the
learned Advocate submits that the Petitioners are present in the Court
khs/July 2023/61
and they desire to withdraw this petition.
4.In view of the above, this petition is disposed off, as
withdrawn.
( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
khs/July 2023/61
Shravabal Mata Pita Seva Sangh Sonai
Rajendra Eknath Nimbalkar
Union of India
Y. G. Khobragade
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court