Partly allowed

The State of Maharashtra and Others v. Pawan Ashok Bhingardive and Ors.

Bombay HC27 Jul 2023CA/9203/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court dismissed the PIL as withdrawn by the petitioner on the premise that the alleged encroachers were landowners who commenced construction without permission. The deposited amount was directed to be split between two orphanages. In a connected civil application, a recall order was partly recalled, recalling the cost imposition on the Collector and directing another donation.

What did the court decide?

The PIL is dismissed as withdrawn. The deposited Rs.25,000/- is to be distributed equally to Infant India, Anandwan and Shantivan Arvi. The order of 12.07.2023 is partly recalled.

The State of Maharashtra and Others Vs Pawan Ashok… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

917 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.24 OF 2019 WITH CA/9203/2023 IN PIL/24/2019

¶4

PAWAN ASHOK BHINGARDIVE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶5

Mr.S.R.Andhale, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.D.R.Kale, Govt.Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr.S.T.Shelke, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 5 to 7.

¶6

DATE : JULY 27, 2023

¶7

PER COURT :

¶8

The pleadings in this petition are on the premise that certain persons are ‘culprits and encroachers’ (paragraph Nos. 15 and 16 of the memo of the petition).

¶9

After hearing the learned Advocates for the respective sides and upon perusing the petition paper book, more particularly the affidavit in reply filed by the District Collector in response to the order of this Court dated 27.01.2023, we find that the unnamed persons (not arrayed as Respondents before the Court and whose names are not set khs/July 2023/24

¶10

- 2 -

¶11

out in the pleadings), prima-facie, are not encroachers. Those 16 persons, identified by the Collector, are land owners having a proper title. It is only that they commenced construction without acquiring permission. Notices have been issued to them.

¶12

The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner desires to withdraw this petition and if advised, would prefer a civil suit before the competent Civil Court.

¶13

In view of the above, this PIL is dismissed as withdrawn . Considering the above, the amount of Rs.25,000/- deposited in this Court, alongwith accrued interest, shall be distributed in equal proportions to two orphanages/institutions (which care for young children/orphans) and the Registry shall transmit the said amount through bank transfer to Infant India, Anandwan, 659/Infant Hill, In front of Bindusara Dam, N.H.211, Pali, Beed - 431122 (Bank Details - Canara Bank A/c No.3773201000011, IFSC Code : CNRB0003773) and Orphanage Home i.e. "Shantivan", Arvi, Tq.Shirur Kasar, Dist.Beed "Bhavani Vidhyarthi Kalyan Pratishthan, Arvi" (Bank Details : State Bank of India, Branch Shirur (Kasar), A/C No.33446000963, IFSC Code

khs/July 2023/24

- SBIN0005995).

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9203/2023

¶18

In so far as the Civil Application No.9203/2023, by which the District Collector has moved an application praying for recalling the order dated 12.07.2023, the learned Government Pleader submits that the order of this Court dated 27.01.2023 was not brought to the notice of the District Collector. Show cause notices have been issued to the concerned persons dealing with the litigation branch and those who were duty bound to bring the order to the notice of the District Collector. The said Officer has recently joined on 15.02.2023. He was not even apprised, whether the order of this Court dated 27.01.2023 was brought to the notice of the earlier Collector. Though he tenders an apology, he further submits that the amount deposited by him may be donated to the Anand Gram (Infant) India) Canara Bank, Pali Branch, IFSC Code : CNRB0003773, A/c No. 3773201000011.

¶19

In view of the above, the order dated 12.07.2023 is partly recalled with the following observations :-

¶20

[a] The action taken report with regard to those responsible for not

¶21

khs/July 2023/24

¶22

apprising the District Collector of the order of the High Court dated 27.01.2023, shall be placed before this Court in the 3rd week of October, 2023.

¶23

[b] The direction of imposing costs on the District Collector is recalled and instead we record his statement that he would donate the amount of Rs.5,000/-.

¶24

[c] The amount deposited in this Court be transferred to Anand Gram (Infant) India) Canara Bank, Pali Branch, IFSC Code : CNRB0003773, A/c No. 3773201000011.

¶25

( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶26

khs/July 2023/24

The State of Maharashtra and Others v. Pawan Ashok Bhingardive and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Maharashtra and Others v. Pawan Ashok Bhingardive and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Aurangabad Municipal Corporation Aurangabad through Its Municipal Commissioner Vs Vikas Prakash Yedake and Others

Kaduba Sheshrao Tangde Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Others

Prafulla Adhar Shinde Vs the National Highway Authority of India through Its Project Director and Others

M/S Shri Ambika Fertilizers through Its Partner Ninesh Damodhar Bhutada Vs the Union of India through Its Secretary and Others

Shravanbal Mata Pita Seva Sangh Sonai through Its President Rajendra Eknath Nimbalkar and Another Vs the Union of India and Others

Mohamad Salman Qureshi and Others Vs the Udgir Municipal Council through Its Chief Officer and Others