PIL petition disposed of as withdrawn upon request by the petitioner, citing the pendency of another petition (No.140/2022) for the same issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Diksha Rane 2-pil-53-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
DIKSHA DINESH
RANE
Digitally signed by DIKSHA DINESH RANE Date: 2023.03.17 11:21:48 +0530
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 53 OF 2023
Suresh Vitthalrao Barge and Ors. ..Petitioners VS. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents
Adv. Rajesh A. Tekale for the petitioners. Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w. Mr. B. V. Samant, AGP for State a/w. Mrs. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for State
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, Act.CJ.& SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE: MARCH 16, 2023
P.C.:-
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw this PIL petition as another PIL petition for the same issue bearing No.140/2022 is pending.
2. In view of the request made, PIL petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
1/1
Diksha Dinesh Rane
Suresh Vitthalrao Barge and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
S. V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
