The petitioner withdrew the writ petition during arguments. The court disposed of the case as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Disposed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition with proper pleadings and effective prayers.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16-PIL-31-2020
Jvs.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 31 OF 2020
JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE
Digitally signed by JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Date: 2023.07.17 18:30:08 +0530
Captain Haresh Gaglani (Retd.) .. Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Prashant Pandey i/b. Unawalla, Mr. Dinesh Jadhwani, Mr. Ashish Jain and Ms. Dipsy Sequeria i/b. W3 Legal LLP for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. P. Pakade, Government Pleader with Ms. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for State.
CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR, ACTING CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE: 12 JULY 2023
P.C.:
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Jayant Vishwanath Salunke
State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
