Public interest petition filed by Sakin Eknathrao Ekaad regarding action against officers. Petitioners subsequently sought to withdraw the petition; the Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed off the matter.
Petition disposed off as withdrawn on instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903PIL22-23
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.22 OF 2023
SACHIN EKNATHRAO EKADE AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mahesh P. Kale
AGP for Respondents State: Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya
CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE : 3rd August, 2023
ORDER:
1.This matter was heard for some time and we noticed that the
the petition is bereft of details, research and specific data. So also, the
two petitioners desire that departmental enquiries be initiated against
15 officers and strict action be taken against them, in the absence of
any specific information, specific contentions or material.
The learned Advocate for the petitioners sought a pass over to take
instructions. He, thereafter, submits on instructions that the petitioners
desire to withdraw this petition.
2.In view of the above, this petition is disposed off as
withdrawn on instructions.
( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. )
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
JPChavan
SACHIN EKNATHRAO EKADE AND ANOTHER
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court