Appeal regarding an arbitration petition was disposed of as withdrawn by the High Court of Bombay at the instance of the appellant, as the dispute would now be raised in pending arbitration proceedings before the learned arbitrator.
Appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-APP-168-2022.doc
1
Trupti
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 168 OF 2022 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 315 OF 2021
… M/s. Aafcon Developers Appellant
versus
… Bhupatrai K. Mehta Respondent
Mr. Vishal Mehta i/b. MV Law Partners for the Appellant. Mr.Ranjeev Carvalho with Mr.Prayag Joshi i/b. Joshi Law Associates for the Respondent.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR, ACJ & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 7 JULY 2023
P.C.:
The learned Counsel for the Appellant states that he has received instructions to withdraw the Appeal. The Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn because the parties are now before the learned Arbitrator and the dispute would be raised in the pending arbitration proceedings.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
ARIF S. DOCTOR
M/s. Aafcon Developers
Bhupatrai K. Mehta
Nitin Jamdar
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
