The Single Judge disposed of anMisc. Civil Application based on a Consensual Settlement Agreement filed by both parties and their counsel. The terms were accepted as court undertakings and the application was disposed of accordingly.
Consent Terms marked 'X' as undertakings; Application disposed of on terms of settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43-MCA-375-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 375 OF 2022
SMITA SIDDHARTH RAHANE @
SMITA SOMNATH MADKAR...APPLICANT
V/s.
SIDDHARTH SHAMSUNDAR RAHANE ...RESPONDENT
Ms. Prabha Badadare, Advocate for the Applicant
Mr. A. V. Taskar i/b Mr. Narayan Rokade, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM:ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE:27th October, 2023
P.C. :
1. Both the learned Counsel for the parties tender across the bar the
Consent Terms dated 27th October, 2023, signed by the Applicant and
Respondent as well as the learned Counsel. Learned Counsel submit
that the parties have settled the dispute amicably on the basis of the
Consent Terms. Parties are present in the Court. Consent Terms are
taken on record and marked ‘X’ for the purposes of identification. The
undertakings contained in the Consent Terms are accepted as
Undertakings of the Court.
2. The Application stands disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Nikita Gadgil 1/1
Smita Siddharth Rahane @ Smita Somnath Madkar
Siddharth Shamsundar Rahane
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court