The High Court of Bombay dismissed Minor's Criminal Appeal No. 323 of 2022, confirming the Family Court at Nasik's permission for the applicant to appear via video conferencing in a related habeas corpus petition, accepting the respondent's objection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11. MCA 323-22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 323 OF 2022
Prabhjeet Kaur Bhamra...Applicant
V/s.
Harpreet Singh Bhamra ...Respondent
Ms. Rukmini Khairnar, Advocate for the Applicant
Ms. Taubon Irani with Ms. Disha Shetty, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM:ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE:26th October, 2023
P.C.:
1. This matter was heard at length yesterday and today.
2. Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits on instructions from
the Applicant, who is present in the Court today, that this application can be disposed of clarifying that the Family Court at Nasik hearingPetition No. A-113/2022, permit the Applicant to appear in the matter
through video conferencing on dates when her physical presence is not
required, upon an application in that behalf.
3. Ms. Irani, learned Counsel for the Respondent has no objection.
4. Ordered Accordingly.
5. Application stands disposed as above.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Nikita Gadgil 1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court at Nasik should permit the applicant to appear via video conferencing in habeas corpus matter Petition No. A-113/2022.
Prabhjeet Kaur Bhamra
Harpreet Singh Bhamra
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court