The court disposed of a miscellaneous civil application as infructuous because the parties had settled and filed mutual divorce petitions, leaving no subsistance for the matter. (12 words)
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
40-mca-265-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 265 OF 2022
Mrs. Prajakta Rasik Barve...Applicant
V/s.
Mr. Rasik Rajan Barve...Respondent
Mr. Vipin R. Kasle, Advocate for the Applicant.
CORAM:ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE:8th DECEMBER, 2023
P.C. :
NIKITA YOGESH GADGIL
Digitally signed by NIKITA YOGESH GADGIL Date: 2023.12.09 13:38:58 +0530
1.Mr. Kasle, learned Counsel appears for the Applicant and submits
that the matter has been settled between the parties, as the parties
have filed mutual divorce petition and nothing survives in this
application.
2. The Application accordingly stands disposed as infructuous.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Nikita Gadgil 1/1
Mrs. Prajakta Rasik Barve
Mr. Rasik Rajan Barve
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court