In this miscellaneous civil application, the applicant submitted that the trial court had already decided the divorce petition with nothing left to survive. The respondent agreed. The court disposed of the application as infructuous.
Application disposed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
38-mca-244-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 244 OF 2021
Sou. Palavi Sandip Sarkale...Applicant
V/s.
Shri. Sandip Lahu Sarkale...Respondent
Mr. Kishor Ajetrao, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. Shahid Ali Ansari, Advocate for Respondent.
CORAM:ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE:8th DECEMBER, 2023
P.C. :
1. Mr. Ajetrao, learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that the
NIKITA YOGESH GADGIL
Digitally signed by NIKITA YOGESH GADGIL Date: 2023.12.09 13:38:59 +0530
Trial Court has already decided the divorce petition and nothing
survives in this matter. Mr. Ansari, learned Counsel for the Respondent,
confirms the same.
2. Application accordingly stands disposed as infructuous.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Nikita Gadgil 1/1
Palavi Sandip Sarkale
Sandip Lahu Sarkale
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court