Disposed

Deepali Nikhil Nimsudkar v. Nikhil Balkrishna Nimsudkar

Bombay HC15 Dec 2023MCA/232/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a miscellaneous civil application, the High Court of Bombay disposed of the matter based on a successful mediation settlement. The court accepted the settlement terms signed on December 14, 2023, which involved payment of Rs. 6,00,000/-, as undertakings to the court.

What did the court decide?

Settlement terms dated 14 December 2023 accepted as undertakings to the court; Application disposed of.

Deepali Nikhil Nimsudkar Vs Nikhil Balkrishna… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

1 46 mca 232-23-c.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.232 OF 2023

¶4

Deepali Nikhil Nimsudkar… Applicant
Vs.

¶5

Nikhil Balkrishna Nimsudkar … Respondent

¶6

Ms. Vaishnavi M. Gujarathi, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. S. S. Jinsiwale, Advocate for the Respondent.

¶7

CORAM :ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE :15 DECEMBER, 2023.

¶8

P.C.:

¶9

1. Both the learned counsel, Ms. Gujarathi, for the Applicant and Mr. Jinsiwale, for the Respondent submit that mediation has been successful. Mr. Jinsiwale submits that part of the amount of the settlement of Rs.6,00,000/- has been handed over by the Respondent to the Applicant today by demand draft.

¶10

Digitally signed by PRIYA PRIYA RAJESH RAJESH SOPARKAR SOPARKAR Date: 2023.12.16 15:06:13 +0530

¶11

2. The mediation report is received. The sealed cover is opened. The report dated 14^th December, 2023 is perused. The said report contains the Settlement Terms dated 14^th December, 2023 between the parties signed

¶12

by the parties and their Advocates, which is shared with the learned

¶13

1 of 2

¶14

Priya R. Soparkar

¶15

2 46 mca 232-23-c.doc

¶16

counsel and after their perusal is taken on record and marked “X” for the

¶17

purposes of the identification. The undertakings in the settlement terms
are accepted as undertakings to the court.

¶18

3. The Application stands disposed in terms of the Settlement Terms

¶19

as above.

¶20

(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)

¶21

2 of 2

¶22

Priya R. Soparkar

Deepali Nikhil Nimsudkar v. Nikhil Balkrishna Nimsudkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepali Nikhil Nimsudkar v. Nikhil Balkrishna Nimsudkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashwini Dhanaji Kandekar Vs Vikas Pandurang Solse

Ashwini Ashish Raikwar Vs Ashish Vithal Raikwar

Rakhi Swapnil Igave Vs Swapnil Anil Igave

Sau. Shradha Shashikant Gore Vs Shri. Shahsikant Balkrushna Gore

Bhagyashri @ Puruvi Ranjit Patil Vs Ranjit Dilip Patil

Ashwini Sanket Tikhande @Ashwini Arun Kapote Vs Sanket Sadashiv Tikhande