Dismissed
Smita Sakharam Aroskar v. Ms Ish Homes Pvt. Ltd.
Bombay HCMCA/170/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Mater dismissed on withdrawal by Mr. Sen for the Applicants.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13. MCA 140-23 @Connected matters.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.140 OF 2023
KEVIN ARVIND SHAH)...APPLICANTV/s. |
|---|
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD)...RESPONDENT |
WITH |
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.142 OF 2023 |
KALPESHKUMAR PARMANAND DAVE)...APPLICANTV/s. |
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD)...RESPONDENT |
WITH |
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.141 OF 2023 |
RATANDEEP DEEPAK SHANKAR)...APPLICANTV/s. |
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD)...RESPONDENT |
WITH |
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.170 OF 2023 |
SMITA SAKHARAM AROSKAR)...APPLICANTV/s. |
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD)...RESPONDENT |
WITH |
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.179 OF 2023 |
RAVIPRAKASH RAGHUNATH BHANDGE)...APPLICANTV/s. |
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD)...RESPONDENTWITH |
Nikita Gadgil 1/4
13. MCA 140-23 @Connected matters.doc
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.172 OF 2023
VIJAY LAKSHMINARAYAN SHUKLA)...APPLICANT
V/s.
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD)...RESPONDENT
WITH
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.175 OF 2023
BHARGAV DAMODAR BHOSALE)...APPLICANT
V/s.
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD)...RESPONDENT
WITH
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.178 OF 2023
SUBHASH PARMESHWAR GUPTA)...APPLICANT
V/s.
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD)...RESPONDENT
WITH
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.174 OF 2023
SHOBHANA SAKHARAM AROSKAR)...APPLICANT
V/s.
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD)...RESPONDENT
WITH
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.177 OF 2023
GORAKHPRASAD MADANLAL GUPTA)...APPLICANT
V/s.
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD)...RESPONDENT
WITH
Nikita Gadgil 2/4
13. MCA 140-23 @Connected matters.doc
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.169 OF 2023
RAJENDRA KRISHNAKANT BHAT)...APPLICANT
V/s.
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD)...RESPONDENT
WITH
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.176 OF 2023
ABHIJEET ASHOK DUDHWADKA)...APPLICANT
V/s.
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD)...RESPONDENT
WITH
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.171 OF 2023
SMITA SAKHARAM AROSKAR)...APPLICANT
V/s.
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD)...RESPONDENT
WITH
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.168 OF 2023
DEVENDRA SAKHARAM AROSKAR)...APPLICANT
V/s.
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD)...RESPONDENT
WITH
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.173 OF 2023
GHANSHYAM CHOTELAL MISHRA)...APPLICANT
V/s.
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD)...RESPONDENT
Nikita Gadgil 3/4
13. MCA 140-23 @Connected matters.doc
Mr. Sunip Sen i/by Mr.Tanvir Shaikh, Advocate for the Applicants in
MCAs No.140/2023, 142/2023, 141/2023, 170/2023, 172/2023,
175/2023, 174/2023, 169/2023, 171/2023 and 168/2023.
Mr. S. A. Jabbar, Advocate for the Applicant in MCA/176/2023.
Mr. K. C. Pandey, Advocate for the Applicant in MCA/173/2023.
Ms. Ankita i/b Mr.Subhash Bane, Advocate for the Applicants in MCAs
No.177/2023, 178/2023 and 179/2023.
Ms. Shruti Tulpule i/by Ms. Ketki Gadkari, Advocate for the Respondent
no.1 in all 15 MCAs.
P.C.:
1. When the matter is called out, Mr. Sen, learned Counsel for the
Plaintiff in these Applications informs the Court that the Applications
filed before the Small Cause Court for consolidation of the Trial Court
proceedings as well as the Appeals in view of office order No. 37 of 11
dated 28th February, 2011 has just been dismissed by the learned Chief
Judge of the Small Causes Court, which dismissal, the Applicants have
instructions to challenge.
2. In this view of the matter, Mr. Sen, on instructions, seeks to withdraw these Applications. Applications are allowed to be withdrawn and are disposed of accordingly.
3. All contentions are kept open.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Nikita Gadgil 4/4
KEVIN ARVIND SHAH
MS ISH HOMES PVT. LTD
ABHAY AHUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court