The single judgment of the Bombay High Court directly disposed of a miscellaneous civil application by granting leave to withdraw the proceedings, resulting in the application being marked as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the application; application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-MCA-150-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.150 OF 2022
MR. ROHAN JAYANT GAIKWAD
V/s.
)...APPLICANT
MRS. MINAL ROHAN GAIKWAD)...RESPONDENT
Mr. S.M. Bhavar h/f Mr. R.B. Khot, Advocate for the Applicant.
Ms. Darshana Kambli, Advocate for the Respondent.
Mr. Rohan Gaikwad, Applicant is present.
CORAM:ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE:10th NOVEMBER, 2023
P.C. :
. Mr. Bhavar, learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks leave of this
Court to withdraw the Application. The application stands disposed of
as withdrawn.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Nikita Gadgil 1/1
MR. ROHAN JAYANT GAIKWAD
MRS. MINAL ROHAN GAIKWAD
ABHAY AHUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court