The High Court dismissed the Miscellaneous Civil Application as the applicant failed to appear on the date listed for dismissal.
Application dismissed due to non-appearance of the applicant on the date of dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-MCA-105-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.105 OF 2022
SWATI SWAPNIL RAMTEKE NEE
SWATI TULJAPPA KAMBLE
)...APPLICANT
V/s.
SWAPNIL RADHAKISAN RAMTEKE
)...RESPONDENT
None for the Applicant and Respondent.
CORAM:ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE:10th NOVEMBER, 2023
P.C. :
1. On 20th October, 2023, the following order was passed, as none
appeared for the Applicant:-
“1. None appears for the Applicant.2.On the earlier date also, none appeared for the
Applicant and the following order was passed :
“1. None for the Applicant.2. This matter was last listed on 6th April, 2022, when this Court had issued notice. The office remark indicates that the notice issued to the Respondent has been returned unserved with Bailiff remark as “Door found locked. Not found as the time of service”.
3. However, since none appears for the Applicant, list this matter on 20th October, 2023.
3. It appears that the Applicant is not serious about prosecuting this Application.
4. Accordingly, list for dismissal on 10th November 2023 .”
Nikita Gadgil 1/2
2-MCA-105-2022.doc
2. Today, the matter is listed under the caption for dismissal. Again
none appears for the Applicant today. Accordingly, application stands dismissed.(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Swati Swapnil Ramtekee
Swapnil Radhakisan Ramtekee
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court