Disposed

Mr. Shankarling Nee Basaveshwar Chanbasappa Bhogade and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra, through the Chief Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC5 Dec 2023IA/7702/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This interim order allows the petitioners to amend their writ petition within two weeks. The application is disposed of without costs, permitting respondents to file affidavits after service of the amended petition.

What did the court decide?

Interim application allowed; petitioners permitted to amend Writ Petition within two weeks; no order as to costs.

Mr. Shankarling Nee Basaveshwar Chanbasappa… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

5-IA-7702-2023 WP-11074-2017.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

SHRADDHA KAMLESH TALEKAR

¶4

Digitally signed by SHRADDHA KAMLESH TALEKAR Date: 2023.12.12 16:55:04 +0530

¶5

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7702 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 11074 of 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11074 of 2017

¶6

(1) Mr.Shankarling @ Basaveshwar Chanbasappa Bhogade & Anr. ...Applicants In the matter between : (1) Mr.Shankarling @ Basaveshwar Chanbasappa Bhogade & Anr. .. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra Through the Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra & 6 Ors. …Respondents

¶7

Dr.Ramdas Sabban a/w. Mr.Pravin Sabban, Advocate for Applicants/Petitioners.

¶8

Mr.A.I. Patel, Addl.G.P. a/w. Ms.M.S. Bane, AGP for Respondent No.1-State.

¶9

Mr.I.M. Khairdi a/w. Mr.Sachin Patil , Advocate for Respondent No.7.

¶10

CORAM : B.P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 05, 2023.

¶11

P C :

¶12

The above Interim Application is filed seeking certain amendments

¶13

Page 1 of 3 DECEMBER 05, 2023

¶14

Shraddha Talekar, PS

¶15

5-IA-7702-2023 WP-11074-2017.doc

¶16

to the Writ Petition.

¶17

The above Writ Petition was admitted by this Court vide order dated 18^th October 2022. In the said order, liberty was granted to the Petitioners to take inspection of the documents relied upon by the State of Maharashtra and apply for amendment, if warranted. The Petitioners have taken inspection and after that have filed the present application seeking amendments.

¶18

In the light of the aforesaid liberty, we are of the opinion that the Interim Application can be allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads thus :

¶19

(a) this Hon’ble High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioners to amend the Writ Petition in terms of the Draft Amendment, annexed hereto as Exhibit-A.

¶20

The amendments shall be carried out within a period of two weeks from today and the amended copy of the Petition shall be served upon the Respondents once again within a period of two weeks thereafter. The Respondents are at liberty to file affidavits and/or additional affidavits to the amended Petition within a period of three weeks from the date of service of the copy of the amended Petition.

¶21

Page 2 of 3 DECEMBER 05, 2023

¶22

Shraddha Talekar, PS

¶23

5-IA-7702-2023 WP-11074-2017.doc

¶24

The Interim Application is accordingly disposed of. No order as to

¶25

costs.

¶26

This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.

¶27

[SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] [B.P. COLABAWALLA, J. ]

¶28

Page 3 of 3 DECEMBER 05, 2023

¶29

Shraddha Talekar, PS

Mr. Shankarling Nee Basaveshwar Chanbasappa Bhogade and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra, through the Chief Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Shankarling Nee Basaveshwar Chanbasappa Bhogade and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra, through the Chief Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Shashi P. Gaur and Ors. Vs State Bank of India and Ors.

Satishkumar Surendra Shetty Vs Kotak Mahindra Thru Its Manager and Nar

Sudarshan Tukaram Salgar vs Chandrakant Ramchandra Deshmukh and Ors.

Kapil Natwarlal Gor vs Nutan Realty

Satiate Engineering (I) Pvt. Ltd. Represented by Its Director vs the Board of Directors of Axis Bank Ltd. Represented by Its Managing Director

Kaushalyadevi Anilkumar Agarwal and Ors. vs Authorised Officer Dcb Bank Limited Company and Ors.