A writ petition was filed by the petitioner against the respondents. The petitioner sought leave to unconditionally withdraw the petition, which the court granted by dismissing it as withdrawn.
Leave to unconditionally withdraw the writ petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
44 WP 10851-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 10851 OF 2023
LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE
Digitally signed by LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Date: 2023.12.04 17:54:04 +0530
Satishkumar S. Shetty
Versus
Kotak Mahindra & Anr.
.. Petitioner
.. Respondents
Ms. Megha Bajoria for the Petitioner.
Ms. M. S. Bane, AGP for the Respondents.
CORAM : B. P. COLABAWALLA &
SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 04, 2023
P. C.
instructions, sought leave to unconditionally withdraw the above Writ Petition.
withdrawn. No order as to costs.
Page 1 of 2 DECEMBER 04 2023
Laxmi
44 WP 10851-23.doc
[ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.]
[ B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]
Page 2 of 2 DECEMBER 04 2023
Laxmi
Laxmi Subhash Sontakke
Kotak Mahindra & Another
B. P. Colabawalla
Somasekhar Sundarsan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
