The High Court of Bombay dismissed the bail application as it was not inclined to entertain it, given the trial was nearly concluded. The trial court was directed to end the proceedings within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
80-BA-4168-21.odt
Digitally signed by MANGALTAI MANGALTAI JAYWANT JAYWANT JADHAV JADHAV Date: 2023.01.24 14:27:11 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4168 OF 2021
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 69 OF 2023 Deepak Krishna Kadam …Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. Abhay Jadhavar for the Applicant. Mr. Amit Palkar, APP for the State.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 23 JANUARY 2023
P.C. :-
The learned APP submits that the trial is almost over and even examination-in-chief of the Investigating Officer is recorded. Considering these facts, I am not inclined to entertain the present application.
( N.R. BORKAR, J. )
MJ Jadhav
1 / 1
Deepak Krishna Kadam
State of Maharashtra
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
