Aslam Imam Kureshi v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
In an anticipatory bail application, the Bombay High Court preview proceedings and rejected the application without hearing the counsel on merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
48-ABA-66-23.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2023 Aslam Imam Kureshi …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. Nilesh Pandey i/b Ms Nidhi Sharma for the Applicant. Ms Veera Shinde, APP for the State.
Mr. J. Khairnar a/w Mr. Aghar Sayyed for the Complainant. Mr. Sandeep Patil, PSI, Mumbai Naka Police Station, Present.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 23 JANUARY 2023
P.C. :-
This is an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for anticipatory bail.
MJ Jadhav
1 / 2
48-ABA-66-23.odt
Digitally
signed by
MANGALTAI
MANGALTAI JAYWANT
JAYWANT JADHAV
JADHAV Date:
2023.02.03
14:23:54
+0530
( N.R. BORKAR, J. )
MJ Jadhav
2 / 2
Aslam Imam Kureshi
The State of Maharashtra
N.R. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court