Allowed

Ashwini Sameer Mhatre Alias Ashwani Kisan Mokal v. Sameer Manohar Mhatre

Bombay HC21 Dec 2023IA/670/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court condensed the delay in filing an appeal by the appellant. The respondent raised no objection. The court referred the parties to the Thane District Legal Services Authority for mediation to resolve their disputes.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay in filing appeal; case referred to Thane District Legal Services Authority for mediation.

Ashwini Sameer Mhatre Alias Ashwani Kisan Mokal Vs… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

Digitally signed by AARTI AARTI GAJANAN GAJANAN PALKARDate: PALKAR 2023.12.29 10:16:50 +0530

¶2

36.IA.670.2023.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.670 OF 2023 IN

¶5

FAMILY COURT APPEAL (L) NO.31120 OF 2022

¶6

Ashwini Sameer Mhatre alias Ashwini Kisan Mokal ....Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Ashwini Sameer Mhatre alias Ashwini Kisan Mokal ....Appellant

¶7

Versus

¶8

Sameer Manohar Mhatre ...Respondent

¶9

Mr. Pramod N. Tambe, Advocate for Applicant/Appellant.

¶10

Mr. P.G. Hartalkar i/b. Mr. Tejas P. Hartalkar, Advocates for Respondent.

¶11

CORAM : B. P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 21, 2023

¶12

P. C.

¶13

The above Interim Application is filed seeking a condonation of delay of 53 days in filing the above Family Court Appeal.

¶14

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶15

Page 1 of 3 DECEMBER 21, 2023

¶16

Aarti Palkar

¶17

36.IA.670.2023.doc

¶18

Applicant/Appellant submitted that according to the office noting the delay is 173 days.

¶19

The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondent-Husband fairly submitted that the RespondentHusband has no objection if the delay is condoned. In these circumstances, the delay in filing the above Family Court Appeal is condoned.

¶20

Now that the delay is condoned, the Registry shall proceed to number the above Appeal subject to the Appellant removing all other office objections within a period of four weeks from today, failing which the above Appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.

¶21

Both parties before us have stated that they would like to explore the possibility of settling their disputes in mediation. We are, therefore, requested that the matter be referred to the Thane District Legal Services Authority, who would then appoint a mediator.

¶22

Considering the consensus between the parties, the parties

¶23

Page 2 of 3 DECEMBER 21, 2023

¶24

Aarti Palkar

¶25

36.IA.670.2023.doc

¶26

are referred to the Thane District Legal Services Authority, who is then requested to appoint a Mediator to try and see that the dispute between the appellant and the respondent can be resolved.

¶27

The parties shall first appear before the said authority on 12^th January, 2024 at 11.00 a.m. All further directions with reference to appointment of the Mediator shall be given by the said authority.

¶28

Place the above matter on Board for directions on 9^th February, 2024 subject to the office objections be removed as directed earlier.

¶29

This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.

¶30

[SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN,J.] [B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.]

¶31

Page 3 of 3 DECEMBER 21, 2023

¶32

Aarti Palkar

Ashwini Sameer Mhatre Alias Ashwani Kisan Mokal v. Sameer Manohar Mhatre

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashwini Sameer Mhatre Alias Ashwani Kisan Mokal v. Sameer Manohar Mhatre

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Malojirao Vinayakrao Nimbalkar Vs Union of India Thr. the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways and Ors.

Dr. Sunanda Maruti Navale Vs Union of India through Commissioner (Immigration) the Bureau of Immigration and Anr.

Malojirao Vinayakrao Nimbalkar Vs Union of India Thr. the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways and Ors.

Mr. Tarun Tiwari vs Ruchi Tarun Tiwari (Ruchi Bajpai)

Dr. Puneet Sunil Shah vs Mr. Netra Puneet Shah

Madhuri Amit Mhetras Vs Amit Balasaheb Mhetras