Shyam Behari Verma v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicants sought continuation of interim anticipatory bail. Court noted earlier observation that prima facie no suppression of facts existed and essential ingredients of cheating were not made out. Investigation completed without need for custodial interrogation.
What did the court decide?
Interim bail granted vide order dated 05/01/2021 is confirmed.
What the court decided
P.H. Jayani 12 ABA01.2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 01 OF 2021
1. Vishal Ashok Pendharkar
2. Mr. Ashok Pendharkar …. Applicants
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 462 OF 2021 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 01 OF 2021
Mr. Shyam Behari Verma
…. Intervenor
In the matter between :-
Vishal Ashok Pendharkar and anr. …. Applicants
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent
Mr. Vivek Babar i/b. Mr. Viral Babar for the Applicants.
Ms. A.A. Takalkar, APP for the State.
Mr. Ashraf Kapoor i/b. Mohammad Z. Khan for the Intervenor.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interim anticipatory bail granted earlier should be confirmed extending protection until charge-sheet filing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vishal Ashok Pendharkar
- appellant
Ashok Pendharkar
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court