An anticipatory bail application under CrPC was declared infructuous because the applicant was already arrested and released on bail during the pendency of the proceedings.
Application declared infructuous and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P.H. Jayani 16 ABA151.2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 151 OF 2021
Sajid Khursid Alam Sayyed …. Applicant
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent
None for the Applicant.
Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP for the State.
Mr. Ashok Patil, PSI, Malvani Police Station, present.
CORAM: SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.
DATED : 16th JUNE, 2023.
P. C. :-
.None present for the Applicant. Learned APP states that during the
pendency of this Application, the Applicant was arrested and subsequently
released on bail. Hence, this Application is rendered infructuous and is
accordingly disposed of.
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
1/1
Sajid Khursid Alam Sayyed
The State of Maharashtra
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court