The High Court allowed the appellant's request to unconditionally withdraw the criminal appeal without liberty, thereby disposing of both the appeal and a related interim application.
Permission granted to withdraw appeal unconditionally without liberty; appeal and interim application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19.apeal-st-14174-22.odt
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL [STAMP] NO.14174 OF 2022
Raju Harishchandra Longale ….Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
.... Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2865 OF 2022
Mr. Gaurav Parkar, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mrs. M.R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent No.1-State.
Mr. Pawan Mali, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
Mr. Sandeep Narute, HC, Dy.SP office, Karjat is present.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE : 20th JANUARY, 2023
P.C. :
1.Learned counsel for the appellant without arguing the
matter, simplicitor prays for withdrawal of this appeal. Permission
is granted. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn
unconditionally without any liberty. A copy of this order be sent to
the trial Court.
2.Criminal Appeal is disposed of accordingly. With
disposal of the appeal, nothing survives in Interim Application
No.2865/2022 and the same also stands disposed of.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Digitally signed by PRADIPKUMARPRAKASHRAODESHMANE PRADIPKUMARPRAKASHRAODESHMANEDate: 2023.01.20 17:20:02 +0530
1 of 1
Deshmane(PS)
Raju Harishchandra Longale
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court