This application sought post-grant amendment of the schedule to a succession certificate to correct an inadvertent mistake in specifying securities. The single-judge bench allowed the application in terms of the prayer clause. Re-verification was dispensed with.
Application allowed to correct the schedule; re-verification dispensed with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-OS:9932
2.IA.228.2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 228 OF 2020 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 2182 OF 2015
Neelam P. Daruwala ...Applicant/Petitioner Kevalran Tuljaram Shahani ...Deceased ***
Mr. R. Mishra i/b Vijay B. Dingreja, for Applicant/Petitioner ***
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J DATE : 13th SEPTEMBER, 2023
P. C. :
Page1 of 2
Shrikant Malani
2.IA.228.2020.doc
securities. The market value will accordingly change, which also needs to be incorporated.
clause (a).
(MANISH PITALE, J.)
Page2 of 2
Shrikant Malani
1 issue framed by the court
Whether post-grant amendment of the schedule to a succession certificate is permissible to correct an inadvertent mistake specifying securities.
NEELAM P. DARUWALA
MANISH PITALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
