Allowed

Gafursaheb Mangalsaheb Kokani v. Aslam Nijam Kokani and Ors.

Bombay HC17 Mar 2023IA/18760/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge allowed applications to implead the legal representatives of deceased respondents in Writ Petition No.10432 of 2019, noting no objection from the respondent and direction to amend the petition within four weeks before listing.

What did the court decide?

Applications allowed to bring legal representatives of deceased respondents on record; amendment to petition directed within four weeks.

Gafursaheb Mangalsaheb Kokani Vs Aslam Nijam Kokani… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

15-IA-18763-22-&-ors.odt

¶2

1 / 2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.18763 OF 2022
IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.10432 OF 2019

¶6

Gafursaheb Mangalsaheb Kokani .... Applicant/
 Petitioner

¶7

versus

¶8

Aslam Nijam Kokani & Ors..... Respondents

¶9

WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.18762 OF 2022
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.10432 OF 2019

¶10

WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.18761 OF 2022
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.10432 OF 2019

¶11

WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.18760 OF 2022

¶12

IN
WRIT PETITION NO.10432 OF 2019

¶13

WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.18759 OF 2022

¶14

IN
WRIT PETITION NO.10432 OF 2019

¶15

WITH

¶16

WRIT PETITION NO.10432 OF 2019

¶17

Mr. Gurudas S. Gorwadkar, Advocate for Applicant/Petitioner in all.

¶18

Digitally signed by MANUSHREE MANUSHREE V V NESARIKAR NESARIKAR Date: 2023.03.20 11:13:18 +0530

¶19

Mr. Aditya P. Shirke a/w Shirvraj Pakne, Advocate for Respondent Nos.13, 17 to 22.

¶20

Mr. S. Gangal, Advocate for Respondent Nos.26(a) to 26(d).

¶21

CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 17th MARCH, 2023

¶22

Nesarikar

¶23

15-IA-18763-22-&-ors.odt

¶24

2 / 2

¶25

P.C. :

¶26

1. All these applications are filed for bringing the legal
representatives of the deceased Respondents on record. Learned
counsel for contesting Respondent Nos.13, 17 to 22 has no
objection for allowing these applications.

¶27

2. Considering that, those Respondents have passed away
and their death certificates are also annexed to the applications,
the applications can be allowed. All these applications are
allowed in terms of prayer clauses 1, 2 and 3 mentioned in those
respective applications.

¶28

3. The corresponding amendment to the main Petition,
shall be carried out within a period of four weeks from today.

¶29

4. The Writ Petition be listed on admission board on
12/07/2023. The amended copy be served on the other side.

¶30

5. Interim applications are disposed of.

¶31

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

Gafursaheb Mangalsaheb Kokani v. Aslam Nijam Kokani and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gafursaheb Mangalsaheb Kokani v. Aslam Nijam Kokani and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uttam Balu Nikam Presently Lodged at Arthur Road Jail Vs State of Maharashtra

Mufti Mohsin Hafiz Abdul Jalil Munshi Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Starwing Developers Private Ltd. , through Its Director Mr. Jitendra N. Vora Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shri. Gafursaheb Mangalsaheb Kokani Vs Shri. Aslam Nijam Kokani and Ors.

Shri. Gafursaheb Mangalsaheb Kokani Vs Shri. Aslam Nijam Kokani and Ors.

Shri. Gafursaheb Mangalsaheb Kokani Vs Shri. Aslam Nijam Kokani and Ors.