The court allowed the writ petition quashing an order that refused the petitioner permission to withdraw Rs.6,00,000/-, holding that previous orders had already authorised such withdrawal.
The writ petition was allowed in terms of prayer clause (d) to quash the order refusing withdrawal of Rs.6,00,000/-.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18-wp-1677-2022.doc
Ghuge
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1677 OF 2022
Mufti Mohsin Hafiz Abdul Jalil Munshi … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Anr … Respondents
Mr. Samir A. Kumbhakoni for the petitioner. Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the State.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : MARCH 16, 2023
P.C.:
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order refusing the petitioner to withdraw Rs.6,00,000/- is sustainable in light of previous orders permitting withdrawal.
Whether the petitioner was properly served with the impugned order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mufti Mohsin Hafiz Abdul Jalil Munshi
The State of Maharashtra
Anr
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
