Allowed

Prathmesh Satish More v. Satish Shivaji More (Deceased)

Bombay HC20 Jan 2023IA/184/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge application allowing amendment to a miscellaneous petition for Legal Heirship Certificate filed by the deceased. Application permitted with consent of the original named heir Sharada Shivaji More.

What did the court decide?

Amendment to the prayer clause of Miscellaneous Petition No. 34 of 2022 and amendment of the Legal Heirship Certificate to replace Sharada Shivaji More with Prathmesh Satish More.

Prathmesh Satish More Vs Satish Shivaji More… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

17-ia-184-2023.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION

¶3

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 184 OF 2023

¶4

¶5

MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 34 OF 2022

¶6

Satish Shivaji More ...Deceased Prathmesh Satish More ...Applicant/ (Ori. Petitioner) In the matter between Prathmesh Satish More ...Petitioner --Mr. Akshay Pawar for the Applicant. --CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 20th JANUARY, 2023

¶7

P.C. :

¶8

By the present Interim Application the Applicant seeks amendment to the

¶9

Miscellaneous Petition No. 34 of 2022, which had been filed for the Legal

¶10

Heirship Certificate of one Satish Shivaji More, who passed away intestate on

¶11

16th October, 2011.

¶12

By an order dated 4th February, 2022, this Court was pleased to grant the

A.B.Kakde

1/3

17-ia-184-2023.doc

Legal Heirship Certificate.

¶17

It is submitted that after the grant of the Legal Heirship Certificate, it

¶18

came to the Petitioner’s knowledge that the said Miscellaneous Petition had inadvertently failed to incorporate the correct prayer clause by inserting the

¶19

name of the Petitioner therein.

¶20

It is for this reason, that the Petitioner now seeks an amendment to the said Miscellaneous Petition.

¶21

I have heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and

¶22

perused the copy of the said Interim Application.

¶23

I find that the only legal heir of the deceased whose name appeared in

¶24

the prayer clause namely Sharada Shivaji More, has filed an affidavit of consent to the present Interim Application.

¶25

I find that the present Interim Application is in order and in the facts and

¶26

circumstances of the case, same is deserves to be allowed in terms of the prayer

¶27

clause (a) which reads as under:

¶28

“That this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to allow the Applicant/ Ori. Petitioner to carry out the necessary amendment to prayer clause (a) of Miscellaneous Petition No. 34 of 2022 as mentioned

A.B.Kakde

2/3

17-ia-184-2023.doc

in “Schedule-A” annexed herewith and further be pleased to amend the grant of Legal Heirship Certificate dated 9^th March 2022 by replacing the name of “Smt. Sharada Shivaji More” with the name of the Applicant/Ori. Petitioner i.e. “Prathmesh Satish More.”

¶33

The Interim Application is accordingly disposed of.

¶34

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J)

¶35

A.B.Kakde

¶36

3/3

Prathmesh Satish More v. Satish Shivaji More (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prathmesh Satish More v. Satish Shivaji More (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayashri Shantaram Phondake Vs Grievance Redressal Committee, Mumbai and 6 Ors.

Mulund Raviraj Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. vs Rupji Constructions a (Partnership Firm) and 2 Ors.

Anshul Sagar Sharma Vs Sagar Vedprakash Sharma @ Sagar Vedprakash Sharma Alias Sagar Vedprakash Sharma (Deceased)

Bhagvanji Raiyani vs Directorate General of Civil Aviation and Another

Bhagvanji Raiyani vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.

Fredrick Joaquim Tavares Vs Joaquim Tavares @ J. Tavares (Deceased)