Disposed
Jayashri Shantaram Phondake v. Grievance Redressal Committee, Mumbai and 6 Ors.
Bombay HCWP/173/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MUGDHAM Digitallysigned byMUGDHAMPARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date:2023.01.2116:20:48+0530
1 30-WP 173-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.173 OF 2019
Jayashri Shantaram Phondake … Petitioner
V/s.
Grievance Redressal Committee, Mumbai Suburban, Mumbai & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Tushar Kochale for the Petitioner. Mr. Himanshu B. Takke, AGP for Respondent Nos.2, 3 and 7-State.
Mr. Vijay Patil for Respondent No.6.
P.C. :
attention to the order dated 22/10/2019 (R. D. Dhanuka, J.) and points out Paragraph 2 of the said order, which reads as under :-
Mugdha
1 of 2
2 30-WP 173-19.doc
possession of the said flat being allotted to the Petitioner. The said letter is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
order.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
Mugdha
2 of 2
Jayashri Shantaram Phondake
Grievance Redressal Committee, Mumbai Suburban
ARIF S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court