The High Court at Bombay allowed an interim application to condone a 27-day delay in bringing proposed legal heirs to record in a second appeal, directing amendment within six weeks.
Application allowed; amendment to be carried out within 6 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
46-IA-17531-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.17531 OF 2023 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.773 OF 2015
Manisha Mukund Nimankar and ors … Applicants IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Mukund Govind Nimankar @ Nimbalkar Appellant
V/s.
Subhadra Kashiram Mahadik … Respondent
None for the Appellant.
Mr. Abhishek Deshmukh i.b Mr. Sachin Kadam, Advocate for Sole Respondent.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : 19 DECEMBER 2023
P.C.:
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.17531 OF 2023
1
Sharada
46-IA-17531-2023.doc
of prayer clause (a) and (b).
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2
Sharada
Manisha Mukund Nimankar and ors
Subhadra Kashiram Mahadik
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
