Single judge bench dismissed an appeal against a Sessions Judge order quashing the lower court's decision due to non-compliance. Court granted petitioner three weeks to comply with documentary directions and pay Rs. 10,000 arrears.
Impugned order quashed; petitioner granted three weeks to comply with directions and pay Rs. 10,000 arrears.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/2
6 - WP 2645 OF 2022.doc
KANCHANVINODMAYEKAR Digitally signed byKANCHAN VINODMAYEKARDate: 2023.12.19 14:45:30+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2645 OF 2022
Jitendra Uttam Jadhav
….. Petitioner
VERSUS
Sau. Mani Jitendra Jadhav & Ors.
….. Respondents
Mr.Laxman K. Kalel for the Petitioner.
Mr.Nagesh Y. Chavan for the Respondents.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 18th DECEMBER, 2023
P.C. :-
This writ petition challenges the judgment and order dated 20 January, 2022 passed by the District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli in order below Ex.1 in Criminal Appeal No. 107 of 2018.
KVM
2/2
6 - WP 2645 OF 2022.doc
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order dismissing the appeal solely for non-compliance should be set aside to grant time for compliance.
Whether the petitioner should be granted a specific period to comply with directions and pay arrears.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Jitendra Uttam Jadhav
Sau. Mani Jitendra Jadhav & Ors.
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
