The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the applicant's interim application as it stood disposed of due to the disposal of the principal appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-IA-12611-AO-445-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.12611 OF 2023 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 445 OF 2023
Vibha Vithhal Adulkar Alias Ratnaprabha Eknath Sawant
...Applicant/Appellant
Versus
Shantaram Bhiwa Sawant & Another ...Respondents
Mr. V.S. Paradkar a/w Mr. Prakash Bhand, for Applicant /Appellant. Mr. Arman Grewal a/w Mr. Rahul Raut, for Respondent No.1
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 06 NOVEMBER, 2023
PC.:
Application does not survive and stands disposed of.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT LIYAKAT JAMADAR JAMADAR Date:2024.01.12 18:50:11 +0530
1/1
Sajakali Jamadar
Vibha Vithhal Adulkar Alias Ratnaprabha Eknath Sawant
Shantaram Bhiwa Sawant & Another
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
