This single-judge bench allowed a writ petition seeking leave to file proceedings against a respondent bank under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, following prior directions.
Leave to file proceedings was granted under Section 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960; petn allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kishor 1/2 32 wp 2215 of 22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2215 OF 2022
Prakash Yashwant Kamthe & Anr. … Petitioners Versus The Stateof Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondent
Mr. Shailendra S. Kanetkar, for Petitioner. Mr. C. D. Mali, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. Sarang S. Aradhye, for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 04 NOVEMBER 2023.
P. C.:
Present petition challenges Order dated 23 December 2021 passed by the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies rejecting leave sought for by the Petitioner under Section 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 for filing proceedings against the Respondent-Bank.
kishor 2/2 32 wp 2215 of 22.doc
petition can also to be disposed of in view of directions issued by this Court in Order 21 August 2023. Adopting same view taken by this Court in Order dated 21 August 2023, the present petition stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Digitally signed by KISHOR KISHOR VISHNU VISHNU KAMBLEDate: KAMBLE 2023.11.07 23:01:07 +0530
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the writ petition challenging the order rejecting leave under Section 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prakash Yashwant Kamthe
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.3 Bank
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
