An interim application for service by pasting was dismissed as it became infructuous because the respondent filed an appearance through an advocate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33-ia-1192-23
1 of 2
Gokhale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1192 OF 2023
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1124 OF 2021
Vaishali Kashinath Gadre ..Applicant.
Versus
Dr. Mrs. Vidya Vishwas Sapatnekar
Through Power of Attorney Holder
Vishwas Murlidhar Sapatnekar & Anr...Respondents
__________
Mr. Indrajeet Kulkarni a/w. Sucheta D. Ghaisas for Applicant.
Mr. Prithviraj S. Gole, for Respondent No.1.
Ms. Pallavi N. Dabholkar, APP for State/Respondent.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE : 13DECEMBER 2023
PC :
1.This application is filed with a prayer to permit the
Applicant to serve the Respondent-complainant by pasting under
the provisions of Section 65 of the Cr.P.C.
VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE
2.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that, now the
Respondent No.1 has filed her appearance through her advocate.
She is represented by an advocate in the main Criminal
Application No.1124 of 2021. Therefore, this interim application
Digitally signed by VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Date: 2023.12.14 14:16:47 +0530
33-ia-1192-23
2 of 2
does not survive.
3. Considering this submission, the interim application is disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Gokhale
Dr. Mrs. Vidya Vishwas Sapatnekar
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court