The court disposed of an interim application seeking permission to serve summons via Section 65 Cr.P.C. as infructuous, since the respondent had filed an appearance through an advocate in the main criminal application.
Interim application disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33-ia-1189-23
1 of 2
Gokhale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1189 OF 2023
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1123 OF 2021
Pradnya Pramod Bapat..Applicant.
Versus
Vishwas Murlidhar Sapatnekar & Anr...Respondents
__________
Mr. Indrajeet Kulkarni a/w. Sucheta D. Ghaisas for Applicant.
Mr. Prithviraj S. Gole, for Respondent No.1.
Ms. Pallavi N. Dabholkar, APP for State/Respondent.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE : 13DECEMBER 2023
PC :
1. This application is filed with a prayer to permit the
Applicant to serve the Respondent-complainant by pasting under
the provisions of Section 65 of the Cr.P.C.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that, now the
Respondent No.1 has filed his appearance through his advocate.
He is represented by an advocate in the main Criminal Application
No.1123 of 2021. Therefore, this interim application does not
survive.
Digitally signed by VINOD VINOD BHASKAR BHASKAR GOKHALE GOKHALE Date: 2023.12.15 11:02:27 +0530
2 of 233-ia-1189-23
3. Considering this submission, the interim application is
disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pradnya Pramod Bapat
Vishwas Murlidhar Sapatnekar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court