This judgment allows the writ petition challenging District Judge and C. J. J. D. orders related to a construction dispute. The court held that ownership was not disputed and the trial court allowed construction subject to statutory margins, refusing to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk 1 20-WP-14176-22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.14176 OF 2022
Vilas Anandrao Patil Vs.
….. Petitioner
Vijay Panditrao Patil ….. Respondent
Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam for the Petitioner.
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 19th JUNE 2023.
P. C.
rsk 2 20-WP-14176-22.doc
boundary of C. S. No.375.
SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to interfere with the District Judge's order in a civil appeal and C. J. J. D. order regarding construction disputes.
Whether the petitioner can construct on his own plot without stopping the construction.
Vilas Anandrao Patil
Vijay Panditrao Patil
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
