The petitioner sought leave to withdraw a contempt petition, stating that the impugned order had already been complied with. The court granted leave and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the contempt petition granted; petition disposed off as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) cp698.23
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
951 CONT. PETITION NO.698 OF 2023
IN WP/6411/2023
SUREKHA LAXMAN LOLAPAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROGH ITS SECRETARY TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT MANTRALAYA MUMBAI
Mr.A.P. Yenegure, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.A.R. Kale, AGP for the respondent/State.
CORAM: R.G. AVACHAT &
KISHORE C. SANT, JJ.
DATED: 01.11.2023
PC :-
01.The learned Advocate for the petitioner informs that the order of
which the contempt is alleged, is already complied and seeks leave to
withdraw the petition.
02.Leave granted.
03. The contempt petition is disposed off as withdrawn.
[KISHORE C. SANT, J.][R.G. AVACHAT, J.]
snk/2023/NOV23/cp698.23
Surekha Laxman Lolapad
The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary Tribal Development Mantralaya Mumbai
R.G. Avachat
Kishore C. Sant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court