Criminal Writ Petition filed regarding non-consideration of an application for premature release pending since December 2022. Court directed Respondent No.2 to decide the application within 10 weeks. Petition disposed.
Respondent No.2 directed to decide the pending application for premature release within 10 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) crwp1644.23
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
928 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1644 OF 2023
AJIT KRUSHNA GHANEKAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Mr.R.A. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.P.N. Kutti, APP for the respondent/State.
CORAM: R.G. AVACHAT &
KISHORE C. SANT, JJ.
DATED: 01.11.2023
PC :-
01.The learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that though the
petitioner has submitted an application for his pre-mature release, still same is
not considered by the authorities.
02.Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the application within 10
weeks from today, which is pending since December, 2022.
03. The petition stands disposed off.
[KISHORE C. SANT, J.][R.G. AVACHAT, J.]
snk/2023/NOV23/crwp1644.23
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the authorities for premature release of the petitioner must decide the pending application within a stipulated time.
AJIT KRUSHNA GHANEKAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R.G. AVACHAT
KISHORE C. SANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court