Arjun Dashrath Waghmare and Otehrs v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AUG:26814-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.411 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4023 OF 2022
Arjun s/o Dashrath Waghmare & ors. … PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors. … RESPONDENTS
Mr. S.S. Bhosale, Advocate for petitioner Mr. A.R. Kale, Addl. G.P. for State
CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT AND SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 19th DECEMBER, 2023
O R D E R :
The order has been complied with. A copy of the communication dated 11/12/2023 in that regard is placed on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners concedes the order to have been complied. The petition, therefore, stands disposed of.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.)
(R.G. AVACHAT, J.)
fmp/-
Arjun s/o Dashrath Waghmare & ors.
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
R.G. AVACHAT
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court