Disposed

Bhika Laxman Solankar through Lrs Laxman Bhika Solankar through Lrs Shripad Laxman Solankar and Ors. v. the Collector Aurangabad and Another

Bombay HC18 Dec 2023CP/146/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bench disposed of three contempt petitions regarding orders turning out claims for compensation under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, allowing petitions to challenge the referenced order.

What did the court decide?

Contempts disposed of with liberty to challenge the orders turning out the compensation claims.

What the court decided

Bhika Laxman Solankar through Lrs Laxman Bhika Solankar… — Contempt of Court | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

2023:BHC-AUG:26796-DB

¶2

1 75-cp 146-2020+.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 146 OF 2020
IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 1278 OF 2019

¶6

Bhika Laxman Solankar (died)
Through his L.Rs.
Laxman Bhika Solankar and others.. Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

The Collector at Aurangabad and another.. Respondents

¶9

Mr. V. G. Mete, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. V. K. Kotecha, AGP for Respondents/State.

¶10

AND

¶11

CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 147 OF 2020 IN

¶12

WRIT PETITION NO. 1276 OF 2019

¶13

Sheku Laxman Solankar (died)
Through his L.R.
Punjaram Sheku Solankar .. Petitioner

¶14

Versus

¶15

The Collector at Aurangabad and another.. Respondents

¶16

Mr. V. G. Mete, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. V. K. Kotecha, AGP for Respondents/State.

¶17

AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 148 OF 2020 IN

¶18

WRIT PETITION NO. 1277 OF 2019

¶19

Raosaheb Shripad Solankar (died)
Through his L.Rs.
Karbhari Raosaheb Solankar and another.. Petitioners

¶20

1 of 2

¶21

2 75-cp 146-2020+.odt

¶22

Versus

¶23

The Collector at Aurangabad and another

¶24

.. Respondents

¶25

Mr. V. G. Mete, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. V. K. Kotecha, AGP for Respondents/State.

¶26

CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT AND
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.

¶27

 DATE : 18th DECEMBER, 2023.

¶28

PER COURT :-

¶29

.The petitioners’ claim for compensation in terms of Section 28-A

¶30

of the Land Acquisition Act has been turned out by the order dated
21.01.2020. The petitioners may challenge the said order. We dispose
of these three contempt petitions in view of the said order.

¶31

2. In view of the same, the contempt petitions are disposed of with

¶32

liberty to challenge the said order .

¶33

( SANJAY A. DESHMUKH )( R. G. AVACHAT )
 JUDGE JUDGE

¶34

P.S.B.

¶35

2 of 2

Bhika Laxman Solankar through Lrs Laxman Bhika Solankar through Lrs Shripad Laxman Solankar and Ors. v. the Collector Aurangabad and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Bhika Laxman Solankar through Lrs Laxman Bhika Solankar through Lrs Shripad Laxman Solankar and Ors. v. the Collector Aurangabad and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babarao Mangilal Ade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Anjali Kiran Mahadik and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Santosh Ramrao Rathod Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Ramkisan Raysing @ Harising Balravat and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Anil Mohanlal Vyas Vs Shri Manu Kumar Shrivastava

Sheku Laxman Solankar through Lrs Punjaram Sheku Solankar Vs the Collector Aurangabad and Another