Dismissed

Sk Chandpasha Khairoddin Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC23 Mar 2023CP/345/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a contempt petition filed in Writ Petition No.14383 of 2019. Relying on the readiness of the Municipal Council to share 50% of costs, the Court directed parties to bear expenses equally and complete joint measurement within six months.

What did the court decide?

Directing parties to bear expenses equally and complete joint measurement within six months.

Sk Chandpasha Khairoddin Shaikh Vs the… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

 1 924-CP-345-2020.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

¶3

924 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 345 OF 2020

¶4

IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 14383 OF 2019

¶6

SHAIKH CHANDPASHA KHAIRODDIN SHAIKH

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶9

Mr. V. V. Bhavthankar – Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S. J. Salgare – AGP for respondent/State
Mr. Abhijeet More – Advocate for respondent no. 3

¶10

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL

¶11

AND

¶12

 M. M. SATHAYE, JJ.

¶13

 DATED : 23.03.2023

¶14

PER COURT : -

¶15

1.We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner,
learned AGP and Mr. Abhijeet More, who appears for respondent no. 3 –
Municipal Council, Paranda. Learned counsel Mr. Abhijeet More, on
written instructions from the respondent no. 3 - Municipal Council,
Paranda, which are taken on record and marked “X” for identification,
submits that the Municipal Council is ready to bear the 50% expenses of
the joint measurement.

¶16

2.This Court had ordered joint measurement by the order
dated 05.03.2020 in Writ Petition No. 14383 of 2019.

¶17

 2 924-CP-345-2020.odt

¶18

3.In view of the readiness of the respondent no. 3 – Municipal
Council to bear 50% of the expenses for carrying out joint measurement,
the learned counsel Mr. V. V. Bhavthankar for the petitioner submits that
the petitioners would bear remaining 50% of the costs.

¶19

4.In view of such arrangement, we dispose of the petition by
directing the parties to process the matter further qua joint
measurement and bear the expenses equally. We direct the respondents
i.e. State authorities as well as the Municipal Council, Paranda, to
complete the exercise of joint measurement as expeditiously as possible
and in any case within six months.

¶20

[ M. M. SATHAYE ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE

¶21

SGP

Sk Chandpasha Khairoddin Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sk Chandpasha Khairoddin Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Hukumchand Duggad and Another Vs Shri Sthanakwasi Jain Sangh Shrirampur through President and Others

Jamil Abbass Sayyed Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Suraj Narayanrao Kanchi and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Matoshri Jijamay Sevabhavi Sanstha through Its President and Members Rahul Govardhan Nagargoje Vs Ravindra Chavan Cabinet Minister Food Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection

Vasudeo Mahadeo Kale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Shivaji Tulshiram Jinkalwad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another