Applications seeking recall of an interim order dismissing writ petitions were dismissed as the judgment itself that disposed of the petition is already passed. The court directed filings within a week but ultimately dismissed the applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca 463.23+3.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.463 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3825 OF 2022
NOORJAHAN W/O HAKKANI PASHA QUADRI VERSUS
UMAR S/O SYED AKBAR JAHAGIRDAR AND OTHERS.
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.460 OF 2023 IN WP NO.3823 OF 2022
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.461 OF 2023 IN WP NO.3826 OF 2022
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.462 OF 2023 IN WP NO.3827 OF 2022
Mr. Quadri S.A.P, advocate for the applicants.
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. Dated : January 13, 2023
PER COURT :-
aaa/-
2 ca 463.23+3.odt
( SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. )
...
aaa/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order dated 9.1.2023 dismissing the writ petitions can be recalled pending the passage of the reasoned order?
Whether the applicant is entitled to time to file written submissions before the reasoned order is signed?
NOORJAHAN W/O HAKKANI PASHA QUADRI
UMAR S/O SYED AKBAR JAHAGIRDAR AND OTHERS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
