Dismissed
Amol Raosaheb Nikam v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Bombay HCBA/770/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
937-ba-770-2023.odt
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO.770 OF 2023
AMOL RAOSAHEB NIKAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
APP for Respondent/State : Ms. V.N. Patil Jadhav
Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. D. J. Patil
CORAM : S.G. MEHARE, J.
DATED : JUNE 08, 2023
PER COURT:-
1. None present for the applicant.
2.The applicant appears to have no interest to pursue the
matter. Hence, dismissed.
(S.G. MEHARE, J.)
Mujaheed//
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application requires hearing absent the applicant.
Amol Raosaheb Nikam
The State of Maharashtra
S.G. Mehare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court