An applicant sought withdrawal of a bail application after the court expressed disinclination to grant bail; the High Court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the application thereupon.
Leave granted to withdraw the bail application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
932 BAIL APPLICATION NO.681 OF 2023
SANJAY SHIVAJI GANGTHADE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Patne Santosh N.
APP for Respondent-State : Mr. K. S. Patil.
Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. S. S. Kulkarni – Appointed.
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.
DATE :08.06.2023
PER COURT:-
1. After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant,
learned APP for the respondent-State and learned counsel for
respondent No.2, the Court expressed disinclination to grant
bail. The learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw the bail application.
[2. Leave granted.3. Bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
4. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services, Sub-
Committee, Aurangabad do pay the legal charges to advocate
Mr. Kulkarni as per the schedule.
vmk/-
Sanjay Shivaji Gangthade
The State of Maharashtra
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court