The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the withdrawal of a bail application with liberty to approach the Sessions Court and made no observations on the merits.
Application allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to approach the Sessions Court; no observations on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Darshan Patil
96-ba-70-23.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 70 OF 2023
Raju Shankar Chavan ..Applicant VS. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Adv. Seema Vishwakarma for the Applicant.
Ms. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 21, 2023
P.C. :
1. Mentioned out of turn.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to
withdraw the application with liberty to approach the Sessions Court for filing a fresh application.
3. The application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed and disposed of accordingly.
4. If any such application is filed, the Sessions Court is requested to consider the same on its own merits.
5. It is made clear that I have not made any observations on the merits of the application.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
1/1
Raju Shankar Chavan
The State of Maharashtra
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
